Skip to content
pricing-packaging-tracker ยท product-manager-skills ยท Flowy
Track competitor pricing and packaging as a diffable time series. Use when monitoring tiers, gates, limits, and price moves on a monthly or quarterly cadence.
One skill from product-manager-skills .
$ npx -y skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills --skill pricing-packaging-tracker --agent claude-codeInstalls just this skill. Get the whole plugin for auto-invocation.
โก How it fires
How this skill gets triggered: by you, by Claude, or both.
Fires itself Claude auto-loads it when your prompt matches the work. You can call it Invoke it directly when you want it. Slash command /pricing-packaging-tracker๐๏ธ Context preview
The summary Claude sees to decide when to auto-load this skill.
Track competitor pricing and packaging as a diffable time series. Use when monitoring tiers, gates, limits, and price moves on a monthly or quarterly cadence. </> SKILL.md
pricing-packaging-tracker.SKILL.md
---
name : pricing-packaging-tracker
argument-hint: "[competitor set, and prior capture if one exists]"
description : "Track competitor pricing and packaging as a diffable time series. Use when monitoring tiers, gates, limits, and price moves on a monthly or quarterly cadence."
intent : >-
Capture competitor public pricing pages into a stable schema, diff against the prior capture, and
report tier changes, price moves, feature-gate shifts, and packaging restructures with URLs and
dates โ because packaging changes signal strategy earlier than price changes do.
type : workflow
theme : market-intelligence
best_for:
- "Keeping battle-card pricing sections current without manual screenshot archaeology"
- "Catching packaging restructures โ the earliest public signal of a strategy shift"
- "Building the pricing time series that grounds your own pricing decisions"
scenarios:
- "Baseline the pricing pages of our four main competitors, then track monthly"
- "Did anyone in our space change pricing or packaging this quarter?"
estimated_time : "15-30 min per run"
---
# Pricing & Packaging Tracker
## Purpose
Track competitor pricing and packaging as a **diffable time series**, not a screenshot: **capture (or
Flowy AI Flows that just work. Hand-picked Claude Code plugins that fire the right skill as you prompt.
diff) โ structure changes โ price changes โ signals โ next-step options.** The stable capture schema
is the point โ run N diffs against run N-1, so the report is what *moved*, with evidence. And the
skill watches structure as closely as numbers, because packaging changes (gates, limits, tier
restructures) usually signal strategy earlier than price changes do: a tier that disappears telegraphs
a move upmarket months before the price list admits it.
## Input
**Works best with:** the competitor set to track (or the snapshot they came from), and the prior
pricing capture if one exists โ that's what turns this run into a delta report.
**Also useful:** your own pricing context, if the comparison should include you.
Input supplied inline with the invocation โ text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an
appended `ARGUMENTS:` line โ counts as answers already given. Use it against the question budget;
don't re-ask.
**Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** With no prior capture the skill runs **baseline mode**:
full capture per competitor, and the delta value starts next run. With no competitor list, it asks โ
that's one of its two budget questions.
**Example invocation:** `Pricing tracker on [Competitor A], [Competitor B], [Competitor C] โ prior
capture from April pasted below.`
## Key Concepts
- **Governing protocol:** honors the [`autonomous-investigation`](../autonomous-investigation/SKILL.md)
contract โ question budget of 2, Fact/Inference/Assumption labels, Just Enough Mode, stable schema,
4-option Final Step. Discipline: SIGINT (pricing pages, site diffs) with FININT corroboration โ see
[`intelligence-collection-disciplines`](../intelligence-collection-disciplines/SKILL.md).
- **Time series, not screenshot.** A single capture is trivia; the sequence is intelligence. The
schema never drifts between runs, because diffability is the entire value.
- **Structure over numbers.** Record tiers, billing units, feature gates, usage limits, free-tier
boundaries, and enterprise-floor signals โ not just prices. The gate moves first; the price
follows.
- **"Contact sales" is data, honestly labeled.** Where pricing is opaque, track what *is* public
(editions, gates, published floors) and mark the rest. Infer only with labels; never invent
prices, tiers, limits, discounts, or negotiated figures.
- **When NOT to use:** you need pricing *strategy* advice โ
[`finance-based-pricing-advisor`](../finance-based-pricing-advisor/SKILL.md) (this tracks the
market; it doesn't set your price); pricing is fully opaque across the whole set โ expect thin
results, and consider [`voice-of-customer-miner`](../voice-of-customer-miner/SKILL.md) or win/loss
evidence instead.
## Application
1. **Determine mode.** Prior capture provided โ delta mode (report changes only). None โ baseline
mode (full capture, then stop).
2. **Credit inline context**, then ask only the unanswered questions (max 2):
1. Which competitors' pricing should I track?
2. Prior capture to diff against, or is this the baseline?
3. **Capture from live pricing pages** โ plan-comparison pages, published rate cards, credible
pricing-change coverage โ with URL and as-of date per competitor.
4. **Emit the schema below exactly** โ diffability is the point.
### Output schema (do not reorder)
~~~markdown
# Pricing Capture / Delta Report
## 1. Run Header
**Competitor set:** | **Prior capture date:** [or "baseline run"] | **This run date:**
## 2. Pricing Capture (per competitor)
### [Competitor] โ [pricing page URL, as-of date]
- **Tiers:** [name: price / unit / billing terms, one bullet each]
- **Key gates:** [which capabilities gate which tier, 2-4 bullets]
- **Usage limits:** [the limits that matter, 1-2 bullets]
- **Free tier / trial:** [boundary, 1 bullet]
- **Enterprise signals:** [published floors, "contact sales" scope]
(Baseline mode: full capture per competitor. Delta mode: this section
only for competitors with changes.)
## 3. Changes Since Last Capture (Delta Mode)
### [Competitor] โ [4 to 8 word change summary]
- **Then / Now:** [old -> new, labeled Fact]
- **Evidence:** [URL, date]
- **Reading:** [Inference โ repositioning, monetization push, response to whom?]
If nothing changed: "No pricing or packaging changes this cycle."
## 4. Signals
- [Cross-competitor patterns: direction of the market's pricing, labeled]
- [Implications for your pricing or battle cards: 2-3 bullets]
### Assumptions to Validate
- [Assumption 1] / [Assumption 2] / [Assumption 3]
~~~
A copy/paste fill-in version of this schema, with quality checks, lives in [`template.md`](template.md).
### Final Step (offer exactly 4 options)
1. Update battle card pricing sections from these changes ([`battle-card-builder`](../battle-card-builder/SKILL.md))
2. Deep-dive one competitor's packaging logic
3. Compare your pricing against this capture
4. Set the cadence and watchlist for the next run
Accept `1`, `2`, `3`, `4`, `1 and 2`, `Verbose Mode`, or a custom path.
## Examples
**A delta entry reading structure, not just price (fictional):**
> ### [Competitor B] โ API access moved from Pro to new Scale tier
> - **Then / Now:** API access included in Pro ($79/seat) โ gated behind new "Scale" tier
> ($149/seat, 10-seat minimum) โ **Fact**
> - **Evidence:** [pricing page vs. archived capture, URL, dates]
> - **Reading:** the price didn't change; the *gate* did. Developer-led accounts are being pushed
> into a sales conversation โ **Inference**: monetization push on their fastest-growing usage
> pattern, and a window for us with API-first buyers while their community absorbs it.
**The cross-competitor signal:** three of four tracked competitors added usage-based add-ons this
quarter while holding seat prices flat โ **Inference:** the market is testing consumption pricing
without headline price increases. Your pricing debate is no longer hypothetical; the Signals section
names the evidence.
See [`examples/sample.md`](examples/sample.md) for a complete worked delta run (fictional
FSM-software market) where both material moves are structural โ a new tier and a relocated gate โ
and no headline price changed at all. [`examples/sample-industrial.md`](examples/sample-industrial.md)
shows the fully opaque case: zero published prices, and structure as the only public signal.
## Common Pitfalls
- **Screenshot thinking.** Capturing once and calling it competitive pricing intel. The value
compounds only on a cadence โ baseline, then diff, forever.
- **Number fixation.** Reporting only price changes while a tier quietly gained a 5-seat minimum.
Structure is the leading indicator; watch the gates.
- **Inventing the opaque.** Filling "contact sales" cells with plausible figures. Publish the
honest boundary and label any inference โ a battle card built on invented enterprise pricing
detonates in a live deal.
- **Schema improvisation.** Reordering or "improving" the capture format between runs breaks every
future diff. The schema is a contract with your own future runs.
- **Tracking without a consumer.** If no battle card, pricing review, or watch report consumes the
output, the cadence dies quietly. Wire the Final Step's first option into a real artifact.
## References
- [`autonomous-investigation`](../autonomous-investigation/SKILL.md) (Workflow) โ the governing protocol
- [`intelligence-collection-disciplines`](../intelligence-collection-disciplines/SKILL.md) (Component) โ SIGINT sources: Wayback diffs, pricing-page monitoring
- [`competitive-intel-watch`](../competitive-intel-watch/SKILL.md) (Workflow) โ the broader watch this tracker feeds
- [`battle-card-builder`](../battle-card-builder/SKILL.md) (Workflow) โ consumes the pricing snapshot sections
- [`finance-based-pricing-advisor`](../finance-based-pricing-advisor/SKILL.md) (Interactive) โ sets *your* price; this skill informs it with market evidence
- Adapted from `market-intelligence/pricing-packaging-tracker-prompt.md` in the
`https://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-prompts` repo.
ยฉ 2026 Flowy ยท Free and open source
Built for Claude Code ยท Not affiliated with Anthropic